Our work requires trust and a little respect.

March 7, 2016 § 6 Comments

Dear Colleagues:

In this era of high speed communications and world trade the function of the interpreter is of unquestionable importance.  There cannot be a globalized society without mutual understanding, and all efforts to understand another culture begin with the transmission of a proposal or an idea by means of the language they speak.

The interpreter is defined as a person who converts a thought or expression in a source language into an expression with a comparable meaning in a target language, conveying all semantic elements as well as the tone and register, and every intention and feeling of the message that the source language speaker is directing to the target language recipients. Basically, it is the action of transmitting ideas between two groups of people who are physically (or virtually) present, but do not understand one half of what is being said in the room.

The question that immediately comes to mind is: Why do these individuals, who have something important to communicate to the other group, believe the conveyed information, and base their decisions in what this interpreter said in their native language? What on earth makes them believe what the interpreter uttered, especially in the many instances when they had never seen this person before? In fact, when interpreting from the booth, the recipients of the interpreting services never get to see the interpreter.  The answer is complex, but it is also very simple: Because they trust the interpreter.

During their life, most humans will have many experiences with providers of goods and services. They will make decisions, some big and others small, based on their expectations as to the quality of some of those goods and services.  In some cases, because of the nature of the service and the characteristics of those who deliver it, they will select the provider based on trust. This is what happens when a person hires a physician, a lawyer or an architect. We put our lives in the hands of surgeons and airplane pilots because we trust that they will perform as expected. We trust that a civil engineer will build us a house that is safe for our family. We trust that an accountant will take care of our fiscal obligations according to the law.  We trust these individuals and their services because they practice a profession. They are professionals who have studied and demonstrated that they can deliver the service, perform the task.

On the other hand, we pick individuals or businesses for other services, or to get some goods, based on an expected result.  That is why when we go to a restaurant we hope that the food is as good as we heard it was, or when we go to the store we hope that the clothes we are going to purchase will fit, last, be comfortable.  We select the providers of these goods and services expecting a desired result: a fast car, an honest housekeeper, and so on.  These goods and services are commercial, they do not fall in the category of professional occupations.  People can join these industries and with skill and perseverance, not necessarily with a formal education or a scientific skill, get to the top of their trade.  A very capable individual can become the best laborer in any giver industry.  Of course there has to be some trust for these businesses to succeed, but this is on the realm of “trust but verify”. That is why we are not shocked when we see a homeowner by the side of the technician throughout the time he is at the house fixing the refrigerator, but we would never even think of joining the surgeon by the operating table while he performs a liver transplant. The second activity is a professional service and it requires absolute trust.

Interpreters fall into the first category. We are professionals providing a sophisticated, complex, and unique professional service.  Like the airplane pilot, we are a trusted professionals and people trust us to the point of letting us be the source of all information and exchanges when dealing with someone who speaks a different language they do not understand.

I have always believed this to be one of the most important characteristics of our craft. Ours is one of very few fiduciary occupations. It is for this reason that I reacted the way I did when I recently faced a situation where they questioned these essential characteristics of our profession.

I consider myself very fortunate because after many years of hard work, I have developed a portfolio of very good clients who value my work and show it on the way they treat me and remunerate my services.  It is not very common to see me accepting an assignment from an unknown source, but sometimes, because the gig seems interesting, or because I have nothing better to do, (provided that my minimum requirements are met), I accept one of these assignments.

Not long ago, I was sitting at my desk working on the blog when I received an email for an assignment that looked interesting.  It got my attention, so I checked my schedule to see if I was open on the date of the event and I was. I must say that the email came from a well-known agency, but with the exception of a job here and there many years ago, I had never really collaborated with them on an assignment.

I responded to the email providing the information they requested: my willingness to take the assignment, my availability on that date, and my fee.  The person from the agency got back to me very quickly to let me know that it all looked great, but they would need me to go lower on my fee. I immediately answered with a resounding: No!

At that point, I thought that this was the end of the story; that just like so many other times in the past, they were going to apply me the silent treatment.

To my surprise, the agency contacted me again on the following morning; this time it was a different person, a supervisor I was told, who wrote to me and stated that she had googled me, that they had asked around, and that after their little research, they had agreed to my fee, and if I was interested, they would love to have me as part of their team for the assignment. I said that I would do it, but that I needed to discuss payment terms with them before going any further. I explained that I have an invoice system that I use, and that I needed them to honor my invoice like the rest of my clients.  It was explained to me that the company’s policy was to use their payment system and invoice forms. I again emphasized the fact that I would only take the job if they agreed to a simple invoice by email process with no other hurdles. I explained that I sell my time and the hours or minutes I was going to spend working on their forms would not be paid by anybody.  The agency representative answered that my conditions were agreeable, and all I had to do was to email them an invoice after the assignment. I agreed and that was the end of the negotiations, which by the way, I have in writing.

Several weeks went by until one day I received an email with the materials for the assignment. Everything was fine to that point, but as I kept on reading until the end of the message, I discovered that they had sent me some forms to fill out, indicating the time I started and finished interpreting. On top of that, they requested that I call the agency at the moment I arrive to the venue, and that their client’s representative sign the form “certifying” that the assignment had indeed started and ended at the times written by me on their form.

I had never been asked to do anything like this before. I felt insulted and got very upset.  They were checking on me, just like they would on the Maytag Man, to make sure I had worked, and my word was not good enough for this folks; they needed me to prove that I was at the event, so they told me to call them; and my credibility was so poor that they needed another individual to vouch for me.

I took a deep breath, actually, I took several, and afterwards I thought of the absurdity of this policy. It was clear to me that they had this rules in place because they did not trust me, and did not trust any of my colleagues. The thing I could not understand is: If they have their doubts about the time I show up for the assignment and about whether or not I actually rendered an interpretation, how is it possible that they let me interpret from a foreign language that nobody in the room understands but me and my booth mate.  They got it all backwards. I felt disrespected by this “interpreting” agency, and I felt that they had insulted my profession.

After a few minutes I wrote them back, indicating that I was not used to be under the surveillance of anybody, that I was a professional who sells his time, skill, and knowledge by providing a professional service, and that I have always expected to be treated with decency, respect, and as a professional. I added that I could not agree to their corporate policy, and for that reason, I was declining the assignment.  It was not long before the person from the agency wrote back, and her email was very telling. It read as follows: “…We regret that (you have) declined the assignment. We agreed to pay you above our usual rate, but unfortunately, we cannot waive the other requirements. This is our policy and it is very similar to that of many others in the industry…”

That is the problem, dear friends and colleagues, these agencies expect to deal with us as merchants, not professionals. Key terms such as “rates” (like a merchant) instead of “fees” (like a professional), give us an idea of who they are looking for in the “industry”. To take one of the words this agency used on their final email: “Unfortunately”, interpreting is not an industry, it is a profession. We cannot work under mistrust, nor for a client (who they would probably call “customer”) who comes to our environment with the same hopes and expectations that you have when you enter the drycleaners.  I deal with clients who trust me to do my work just like I trust the dentist who drills holes in my teeth.  We are a profession. Industries deal with their service providers as laborers, I will stick to those businesses who deal with me as a professional.  I now invite you to share your comments or similar experiences when an agency or a direct client has viewed you as a factory worker and not as a professional.

Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

§ 6 Responses to Our work requires trust and a little respect.

  • Ines Swaney says:

    And I quote:

    >>On top of that, they requested that I call the agency at the moment I arrive to the venue, and that their client’s representative sign the form “certifying” that the assignment had indeed started and ended at the times written by me on their form.<>This is our policy and it is very similar to that of many others in the industry…”<<

    …of the 20+ agencies on my radar, this particularly one STANDS ALONE!

  • Teresa de la Canal says:

    ¿qué piensas de la práctica de algunas agencias que se basan en el juicio de los técnicos para decidir si el trabajo del intérprete fue bueno o no?

  • Consuelo Miquel says:

    Donde vivo sucede mucho lo que comenta Teresa de la Canal. Y algunas agencias pueden llegar a ser nuestros peores enemigos. Excelente entrada, como siempre.

  • Mihai Bledea says:

    Hi Tony,

    Access on Time requested me urgently from a late afternoon phone call requirement for the following day Interpretation Deposition at Radisson Blu downtown Chicago.
    After accepting my rate, similarly to the way you described it as ‘slightly their above regular rate’, we had a back and forth about parking fees and or / if applicable cab fees would apply, simply because Hillary Clinton had the entire hotel booked for the campaign fundraising that she had planned for the same evening and going into the night.
    I explained the cab fee as I had to drive but park a couple of miles away, as not to risk being either blocked or unable to find parking at all at the hotel due to the restrictions in the area …
    We had (I thought, email would suffice, it did not …) all cleared out and about 8:00 PM the back and forth with the project manager was done.
    I went to bed a little bit earlier that evening as I had another very early hospital assignment which should have put me with just enough time to drIve to the one I am trying to emphasize …!
    The following morning I had 4 missed calls and 2 voice mail messages from a Access on Time employee telling me that she hears my voice, the assignment was not to be confirmed at my end … so I thought, really? I finished my negotiation and parking arrangement the night before at 8:00 PM, what else was there to confirm ? Maybe that I was still alive, while asleep, a couple of hours later, when the voice mail messages were left?
    Next morning, while at the hospital with my other client,
    reparing and assisting a really complicated surgery and having to deal not only with language communication but with high emotions with the family members, my cell phone started vibrating for nearly 45 minutes, intermittently, where a male agent this time was trying to confirm I will arive and properly assist my customer with the deposition.
    I had to step out twice as there was another agent trying to reach me in parallel with the first one, so I had to calm down and reassure both all was OK.
    I started driving anout 10:20 AM towards Radisson Blu and realized as I was getting closer that my early planning with parking a couple of miles away made sense as traffic was heavier than usual and several traffic detours were already in place … so I parked, took an $11.75 cab and promptly arrived at 10:50 AM at the Radisson Blu. On my way to the venue, the female agent from the night before called in once to ensure I was on my way to the assignment place … which I said yes, almost there !…
    I had to promise her that once in the hotel lobby, I would call her back to confirm I was indeed in the lobby waiting for the adjuster, my contact I had to work with for the deposition.
    As you said before (which made me think it is the same agency, especially with the signing and witnessing start time and end time), the adjuster had to initial and sigh that the assignment has started at 11:00 AM and ended right at 2:55 PM.
    But this was not the end of the ordeal … to make a long story short, I received 3 more phone calls with all kind of absurd questions, such as did I really ended the assignment at said time, am I really driving back home and what time was I estimating my home arrival at ? (which really made me flip … and I will say no more on this).
    Needless to say, I received the following day a phone call and a survey asking me about my overall experience with the agency and related to the job … so I told them everything I had to say, especially that:
    1. When I do agree and accept an assignment, there was no need for a couple of phone call reminders late into the evening (luckily my cell was off);
    2. As I had another assignment earlier the following morning, the last thing I neded were harassing vibrating on my cell phone reminders about the same deal, already signed, sealed and confirmed;
    3. As I am not a disoriented guy, I met my connection with easiness and there was again no reason to call in and confirm, what? that I met my contact ?!?
    4. That there was, again, complete lack of trustworthiness, reepect and credibility to ask my contact to witness by initials and signature assignment start and end time;
    5. To keep on calling post-assignment and ask very inapropriate and intrusive questions … what if I didn’t drive back home? how would that have sounded or made the assignment different to them ?!?
    6. The survey was really the cherry on the cake … we call it in Romanian ‘cireasa de pe coliva’, almost untranslatable slang, but it pretty much means hitting the last nail in the coffin, right? which was exactly what they were doing …!

    What really surprises me is not the fact that they call this ‘company / corporate policy’ but that somone is really paid and masterminds the whole enchilada, and most often than not, that person never dealt with a client from an interpretation standpoint – not once, never ! …

    P.S. I never got my $11.50 times 2 cab fare rides reimbursed, as they kept insisting that I should have walked and not take a roundtrip cab at their expense … and that’s when I decided to let it go, as I would never take any type of assignments from Access on Time ever again … our profession and life are stressful in many other ways, right?

    • We sent them to fly a kite a long time ago. Do they still exist? These schedulers/verifiers are THE WORST… a total waste of time and money. Thank God that I normally make quintuple in ONE of my regular assignments as compared to doing one assignment for these… these… these… nincompoops. There–, the right word finally came. I am a linguist after all.

      But, I don’t blame AOT too much, as I had the displeasure of running into some of their “interpreters” on the field. Totally unprofessional and plain awful. No wonder they require babysitting. Hmmm…. If AOT is busy with lousy pseudo-interpreters, those impostors won’t have time to rise to my level, and I can have this specialized corner to myself (and a few others).

      One day, like other bottom-dweller companies, who only provide “interpreters” as an aside, these companies will implode. Some already have! They specialize in transportation, medical equipment delivery, etc. Again, like Tony says, for them this is all an “industry” about sending “translators” to “jobs” for “customers.”

  • Janet Green says:

    Muchas gracias. Siempre tienes algo interesante que decir.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading Our work requires trust and a little respect. at The Professional Interpreter.

meta

%d bloggers like this: