The International Organizations and their Official Languages. Do we need to add more?

April 17, 2012 § 5 Comments

Dear Colleagues,

We all know that there are many international organizations that deal with just about anything we can think of; some of them are regional and some are global. These are the official languages for some of the most influential and widespread international organizations:

Languages of the United Nations (UN)
The original official languages of the UN were English, Chinese, French, and Russian, the languages of the permanent members of the Security Council. The choice was largely political.

  • English      was widely used as an international language, as it was the dominant      language of the United States, a superpower.
  • Chinese      was the language of a major power as well as the language with the      greatest number of speakers.
  • Russian      was the language of one of the major powers even though it was not      particularly widely spoken outside of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe.
  • French      was chosen because it was still widely considered the international language      of diplomacy.
  • Spanish      and Arabic were added in 1973, because they      were the official languages of many nations.
  • English,      French      and Spanish      are the working languages of the UN General Assembly.
  • English      and French      are the working languages of the UN Security Council.

Some think that the UN spends too much money and effort on translation and interpretation and that it should adopt one official language. Others think that there should be more official languages. For instance, there is pressure to add Hindi.

Languages of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
The two official languages of NATO are English and French.

Languages of the Organization of American States (OAS)
The official languages of the OAS are English, French, Portuguese, and Spanish.

Languages of the European Union (EU)
The EU has 23 official languages and three official alphabets (Latin, Greek and Cyrillic) for its 27 member states. There are three working languages in the European Commission: English, French and German. The 23 languages create 253 potential two-language combinations. As a result, the European Parliament employs over 4,000 translators and interpreters.

Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Irish,
Italian,
Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish, and Swedish.

Do you think it necessary to have as many languages as the EU, or should international organizations go the UN way and have a few official languages. I would like to hear your opinion as interpreters and translators.

Tagged:

§ 5 Responses to The International Organizations and their Official Languages. Do we need to add more?

  • Maria Blagojevic says:

    Hm, I’d say it depends on the point of view: the more languages there are the more work for us, on the other hand it makes the organization of such conferences awfully complicated. Languages being my work, life and love, I wouldn’t mind the variety of them, on the contrary. I strongly believe we all get richer with every language we add to our language combination. The only disadvantage for the international organizations would be costs!

  • Julia Poger says:

    As someone famous once said (and I can’t believe I get to be the one mentioning this first, it’s so well known!), in your native language you say what you want; in a foreign language you say what you can. Unfortunately, I have heard that even in the EU many people able to speak their own languages thanks to interpreters, tend to speak English anyway. The same goes for the UN: many non-anglophones speak English during meetings. As an interpreter who likes to work, I regret this, as the speakers’ personalities, arguments, message, etc. certainly don’t come through. OTOH, as a person from an anglophone country, I appreciate the advantage this gives us in negotiations…😉

  • Nimo Ali says:

    I think adding more languages gives to people who only speak one language the opportunity to get engaged in variety of issues. Availability of interpreter/translator who are equipped with languages enables the organisation to have access in wider dimension. The only side effect will be using more resources.

  • Amazing says:

    You’ve one of the best web-sites.

  • […] The International Organizations and their Official Languages. Do we need to add more? Lesson 32: No translator has ever been sued, so insurance is a waste of money A Whole Week of Being Chased By Cheapskates from All Over The World Going Global by Going Local: Why localization improves engagement Interpreter wages, UK court debacle, and being caught in the middle! Greek language history, alphabet evolution, numerals, symbols, links Day One of the Literary Translation Centre at the London Book Fair An example of how some LSPs provide expert language services The Prosperous Post-Editor: Interesting Testimony on PE Rates Lesson 31: Does every translator have to be an entrepreneur? Medizinische Übersetzer – keine Ausnahmen von der Regel For translators: The importance of appearing confident 11 Funny Foreign Sayings …And What They Mean Studying in a Castle – two weeks in Edinburgh The Funny Grammar Guide to Making a Point Interview with a Lexicographer (@lexicojules) American Slang From The Early 19th Century How to Make More $$ without Really Trying 10 Tips for Proper Subject/Verb Agreement A different approach to OCR for translation Human translation: What influences rates? Is linguistic inflation insanely awesome? How to Buy a Translation – the 7 Keys Reasonable reply to a common request 11 Forms of Word Patronage to Forgo Republican And Democrat Translator Bad Translator Goes To Washington Badly translated signs store in Etsy Day Two at the London Book Fair “Fun Knee Fry Day” – Say What? Interruptions — Our Daily Lot The Terminology Question Spring cleaning the office Translator’s Metabolism Mind Your Manners! Tips for translators […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading The International Organizations and their Official Languages. Do we need to add more? at The Professional Interpreter.

meta

%d bloggers like this: